How We Rate?

How We Review at Brick.news

Brick set reviews are not one-size-fits-all. Every builder notices different details and evaluates sets through their own lens of experience, which is why two reviews of the same set may look very different. At brick.news, we’ve built a review system that brings structure to our ratings while leaving room for each reviewer’s personality and perspective. This page explains how we approach reviews and how our scoring system works.

Reviewing

Our reviews always start with real building experience. We don’t judge a set by the box art, a parts list, or a rushed speed-build. Reviewers spend meaningful time building, handling, and displaying the set in everyday contexts—whether that’s shelf presence, play potential, custom build integration, or overall design quality. The goal is to give readers a clear sense of what it feels like to own and build the set in real life.

Scoring

Almost every set we review receives a score. Ratings are based on multiple factors, including:

  • Build experience
  • Design and accuracy
  • Playability and display value
  • Part selection and reusability
  • Price-to-value ratio

Scores are not simple averages. Editors may adjust a rating to reflect the complete impression of a set, factoring in cost, competition, and long-term relevance. A score is best understood as a snapshot at the time of release; a set reviewed today might receive a different score if revisited years later.

Occasionally, we may update a score after publication if new information changes the set’s value—for example, price adjustments, re-releases, or significant community feedback. If that happens, we will always explain the reason for the change.

Our Scale

We use whole numbers only—no half points or decimals. Here’s what the numbers mean:

  1. Utter disaster. Avoid completely.
  2. Fundamentally flawed. Almost no redeeming qualities.
  3. Poor. Not recommended.
  4. Mediocre. Serious issues outweigh positives.
  5. Average. Some good aspects, but major weaknesses.
  6. Decent. A mix of flaws and highlights.
  7. Good. Solid, enjoyable, though not perfect.
  8. Very good. Strong design with only minor issues.
  9. Excellent. Nearly perfect execution.
  10. Masterpiece. The best of the best.